If you think the anti-mask/anti-vaxxers are conspiracy nuts, it’s time to reprogram your thinking. Read the Juy 26, 2020 CDC document summary here and the full document here.
Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings
Updated July 26, 2020
This document presents considerations from the perspective of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) for implementing the shielding approach in humanitarian settings as outlined in guidance documents focused on camps, displaced populations and low-resource settings.1,2 This approach has never been documented and has raised questions and concerns among humanitarian partners who support response activities in these settings. The purpose of this document is to highlight potential implementation challenges of the shielding approach from CDC’s perspective and guide thinking around implementation in the absence of empirical data. Considerations are based on current evidence known about the transmission and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and may need to be revised as more information becomes available. Please check the CDC website periodically for updates.
What is the Shielding Approach1?
The shielding approach aims to reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease (“high-risk”) and the general population (“low-risk”). High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or “green zones” established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting.1,2 They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.
Current evidence indicates that older adults and people of any age who have serious underlying medical conditions are at higher risk for severe illness from COVID-19.3 In most humanitarian settings, older population groups make up a small percentage of the total population.4,5 For this reason, the shielding approach suggests physically separating high-risk individuals from the general population to prioritize the use of the limited available resources and avoid implementing long-term containment measures among the general population.
In theory, shielding may serve its objective to protect high-risk populations from disease and death. However, implementation of the approach necessitates strict adherence1,6,7, to protocol. Inadvertent introduction of the virus into a green zone may result in rapid transmission among the most vulnerable populations the approach is trying to protect.
A summary of the shielding approach described by Favas is shown in Table 1. See Guidance for the prevention of COVID-19 infections among high-risk individuals in low-resource, displaced and camp and camp-like settings 1,2 for full details.
QUESTION: Who will the CDC consider among the “high risk” populations? They I.D. the elderly and those with co-morbidity issues, but there has been a lot of clamor from the CDC, the Biden Administration, Democrats and the leftist media, stating unequivocally that the unvaccinated and Christians are responsible for the spread of COVID.
To understand fully where America is heading, read Revelation 18 and the Fate of America (2021 Edition), available Author-Direct at a 25% discount here.
Tags: CDC Camps, COVID hoax, COVID Vaccination, COVID-19 deception, COVID-19 financial scam
James F. Gauss' Blog 
August 13, 2021 at 4:03 PM
James … Look at the names of the contributors in the first document Nada Abdelmagid, Francesco Checchi, Sylvia Garry, Prudence Jarrett, Ruwan Ratnayake, Abdihamid Warsame –Several Muslims. What is this? “Respectable jihad?”