Posts Tagged ‘Illegal Immigration’

March 17 Release! Student Edition

March 17, 2020

studentedition

Size: 7 x 10; 550 pp.; Hard cover; $54.95 (full color)

Table of Contents

SPECIAL INTRODUCTORY OFFER: Order by May 31, 2020 and pay only $39.95 (SAVE $15 or 27%).  Order here: Lakeside Press

“In today’s ever charged torrent of religious and political unrest, it is becoming increasingly vital for the people of the world to understand the truth of both the religious and the geopolitical nature of Islam. The heart, purpose and vision of the Islamic system governed by a complete way of life known as Shari’ah is dangerously misunderstood and highly underestimated by the West. It has been that way for 1400 years, numbing the minds of people like a shot of Novocain before treating an abscessed tooth. This compendium, ‘Understanding Islam in the Light of Christianity’ by Dr. James Gauss, is a vital and valuable resource that will be called upon again and again. If you are a pastor, spiritual leader, governmental leader, business leader or simply a curious person with a sincere desire to understand the heart of both Islam and Christianity, get this book.”

Rev. Dale Witherington
Chief Steward, Restore Minnesota
State Director, Minnesota Prayer Caucus Network

A direct and thorough comparison of the Messenger, Message and Mission of the Qur’an and the Bible.  Over 550 pages of essential information for every college prep and college student.

Your book is the finest and most thorough analysis I have ever seen of the teachings of the Quran in comparison to the Bible. It is a treasure trove of biblical truth, theological insight, and practical application.
My granddaughter is using it in her Global Studies class on Islam this very semester. I think a college-level text book version would be very helpful.
Dr. Ed Hindson
Founding Dean | Distinguished Professor of Religion
John W. Rawlings School of Divinity
Liberty University

With Dr. Hindson’s encouragement, that college-level textbook is now complete.

  •  Almost 350 chapter review questions.
  •  Section review charts and comparisons.
  •  Dozens of  maps, charts and tables of information.
  •  Full color presentation.
  •  “Dig Deeper” challenges for each chapter.
  •  Ten Addendums of additional information.
  •  Hundreds of references and additional resources.

 

The Islamic Game Plan

February 1, 2020

James F. Gauss

Every great team and military has a game plan—a strategy for success and victory. In today’s world of jihadists, Islamic leaders have a very definitive game plan. It is a plan that has existed since the inception of Islam as a political ideology over fourteen centuries ago. It is rather simple and direct—world domination at any cost. Unfortunately, the West and America have no game plan of defense or counter attack other than to acquiesce and to facilitate.

Islam will dominate the world
Western civilization is experiencing the greatest unabashed assault against its freedom and way of life that it has ever known. At the same time, it is this love of freedom that is giving the enemies of the West, and particularly of the United States, unlimited opportunities to denigrate the peoples of the West, Christians and Jews in particular, in a politically correct, multi-cultural, cultural diversity mixture of deception. While the European Union countries are floundering under a demographic Muslim assault, Canada and the United States are not far behind.

As Muslim populations grow in the West, the native citizens of Western countries continues to shrink. With the two-edge sword of abortion and low birth rate in the West, Muslims have a decided natural advantage. Despite the incessant cries of “Islamophobia” from Muslims in the West, it is the Muslim community that is often the perpetrators of verbal and physical attacks against non-Muslims.

By driving out the natives of Muslim lands, the Islamic State and other Islamic terrorists have created a migration crisis in Europe that has brought much stress and threat of harm to the residents of the European Union and North America. With this influx of Muslims has come a dramatic rise in anti-Semitism and other challenges throughout much of Europe, Canada and America. Instead of addressing these issues head-on, far too many Western politicians and law enforcement appear to be content with putting their citizens at risk rather than confront the problem.

Muslims mean business—not just “radical” Muslims, but all those who follow the faith of Muhammad. The West, its governing bodies, news media, educational institutions and security forces appear to be oblivious to the threat that is mounting. A threat that will change the way Westerners experience the world and life around them. Time is short and without wisdom and understanding a nation perishes.

Islam is making inroads into the traditionally non-Muslim world, and is beginning to run deep roots and vie with the laws and cultures of its hosts. Muslims are taking advantage of the freedom that democracies offer. This is the key point for abusing the host country. They use the same provisions of the law that are intended to protect and enhance liberty in order to subvert democracy and freedom. Currently, America is faced with a formidable enemy in a Trojan Horse called Islam (Amil Imani, October 3, 2018).

While the West snores away or offers a helping hand of Christian generosity, “The Islamic Game Plan” has become fully entrenched in Europe and North America.

Gain the Upper Hand Through Fertility. As noted at the beginning of this chapter, the birth rate in the majority of Muslim countries and among Muslims in foreign lands exceeds the replacement birth rate of most Western countries. This is not likely to change soon, but the divergence will only get worse according to current trends.

Annihilate Israel. Ever since Israel re-occupied part of its original land in 1948, the Arab Muslims and Muslims worldwide have striven to force Israel out of their homeland. As you discovered in Chapter 3, that push will continue. The majority of Muslims refuse to accept the presence of Israel in the Middle East and particularly in what is referred to as the Holy Land of Canaan.

In addition, the BDS (Boycott, Divestment & Sanctions) movement, which was founded in 2007 by Palestinian Omar Barghouti, is gaining momentum among anti-Semites in Europe and North America. The goal is to cripple Israel economically, forcing Jews out of the Middle East.

Dominate Europe. The 2015-2016 “invasion” of Europe by mostly Muslim refugees from war-torn Iraq and Syria, as well as from Islamic northern Africa, Afghanistan, Pakistan and elsewhere, while not well orchestrated, was driven by the terror of the Islamic State and other Muslim terrorist groups. Despite its disorganized nature and loss of innocent life on the journey, it served the purpose of the jihadis—to get their fighters into Europe amidst the chaos.

On February 20, 2019, a report was released by the Israeli Directorate of Military Intelligence (abbreviated, Aman, in Hebrew). It estimated, that despite the overwhelming defeat of ISIS in Iraq and Syria, that there were 150,000-200,000 ISIS members deployed worldwide.

Dr. Reuven Erlich, the Head of the Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center in Israel was quoted in the release as saying, “ISIS is preparing to deploy in the Euphrates . . . Then, its members will head to Germany, the U.S., France, and other European countries and Caucuses.”

In the same report, it was revealed that a large number of Islamic State fighters had departed Syria for Iraq in the last six months with a booty of $200 million.

On July 30, 2018, the Voice of Europe reported on a MEMRI (Middle East Media Research Institute) translation of a sermon by a Danish imam, Mundhir Abdallah, given in the Masjid Al-Faruq mosque in Copenhagen, Denmark.

“Jihad necessitates the Muslim invasion and conquest of Europe,” Abdallah asserted, “the final solution to the problem of the Levant—after the establishment of the Caliphate and the elimination of the Jewish entity—will be through the conquest of Europe.”

The Jews “are hastening their own annihilation by their rampaging, their filth, and their vileness, which reflect the immutable nature of the Jews.” The Imam added that he is “not a racist” but that this “has to do with the Jewish character and psyche, with that sick Jewish mentality.”

Invade & Infiltrate America via Civilizational Jihad. Thanks to the complicity and compliance of previous U.S. presidents (and one might go back as far as Carter), key Muslim operatives have successfully infiltrated America’s politics, educational systems, military, law enforcement, legal system and much more. While most Muslims seek to be law abiding citizens, looking to provide for their families, there are nefarious members who are seeking the long term objective of America’s demise and overthrow. In the majority of situations they are being aided, willingly and ignorantly by millions of America’s dhimmi (non-Muslim) citizens. Most effectively by America’s primary and secondary schools, politicians and America’s churches and synagogues.

Suppress Dissent; Declare Opposition as Islamophobic. Not a day goes by where a non-Muslim who voices an opinion about Islam—no matter how factual—is not accused of being a hater, a racist or an Islamophobe (anti-Muslim). It is the newest game plan by the Muslim community and their non-Muslim sympathizers. The attempt is to shut down any criticism or meaningful dialogue about Islam. Islamic leaders throughout the United States have successfully been able to get politicians, law enforcement, educators, policy makers, and many from local communities, and the federal government, to buy into this false narrative hook, line and sinker. In some communities and states, CAIR (Council on American Islamic Relations), a Muslim Brotherhood front organization, has been successful in getting “Islamophobia” criminalized and well on their way to getting some political dhimmis to consider blasphemy laws.

Institute Shari’a. The final step is to ever so slyly, but effectively, get the dhimmis to allow Muslims to have their separate privileges and laws to govern themselves within the larger society, creating a Muslim community that is separate and unanswerable to the larger community of U.S. citizens. While countless Americans declared this will never happen in America, the truth is it is already occurring in various locals.

The Muslim jihadists in America have at least a three-four decade jump on Americans who have “fallen asleep at the switch.” With the rise of socialist dimwits in America due to America’s deplorable, socialistic indoctrination of our youth, it could be too late to turn the tide. The solution is complicated and would require an incredible spiritual awakening in America. The question is: Do Americans want that type of change bad enough to pay the price?

View or order Understanding Islam in the Light of Christianity here.

The Somali: What to Expect

January 7, 2020

 

Somalia Coat of Arms

James F. Gauss

January 7, 2020

Just by the title I can see the heads of the leftists and the interfaithers exploding. But I press on.

Many years ago I had the opportunity to spend several years working closely with a large population of Somali in America on a daily basis. It was a complete immersion experience where I was in their homes almost every day. I became familiar with the culture and customs. Many shared their stories of hardship and personal tragedy back home in Somalia, and/or during their arduous trip to a safer, freer environment. In addition to visiting with families and individuals (young and aged), I also spoke with imams, community leaders and their Qur’an scholar. In addition, I delved into personal research on Somalia, the culture and Islamic beliefs; studied the Qur’an and hadiths. Since I had never met a Somali or a Muslim in my life, I had no preconceived opinion or impression to guide or prejudice me. I grew up in a mixed race, ethnically diverse East Coast neighborhood, and as an adult, on at least two occasions, I chose to live in a neighborhood of color. I share all this only to set the stage for what was to follow.

Initially, our relationships were friendly and pleasant. I found most Somali to be genuinely likeable. However, I also discovered that their thinking and mindset was significantly different from my Westernized, Christian upbringing and lifestyle. As I studied the Qur’an I began to understand a little more on why that might be so. It also raised some inward concerns. I thought, if the Somali (or other Muslims) really believe in what the Qur’an says and Allah commands and what the imams teach, America is in big trouble and the Church in America has a big challenge on its hands.

There was definitely a “honeymoon” period in our relationship. In my desire to build relationships I made certain concessions in order for them to feel more welcome in our community. However, I sadly discovered, that as long as I kept meeting their needs, desires and eventually demands, we remained “friends.” Conversely, when one or more expected me to overlook an injustice or wrong doing and I would not make an exception for them, the friendship quickly dissolved. Along the way, I was disheartened to discover that far too many of the friendly Somali were guilty of acts of fraud, deception and outright lying—sometimes about the most inconsequential of occurrences, where a simple admittance of guilt and apology would have sufficed to rectify the situation.

A side note. One day a young Somali boy came to me and asked if he could help me do something after school the next day. I was pleased at his offer and told him I would have a treat for him afterwards. The next day, after school, he came to see me and he had a sad face. I asked him what was wrong. He said his mother would not let him help me. “Why?” I asked. His reply: “My mom said we don’t work for white people, they work for us.” I was shocked and saddened and wondered what other things Somali children were being taught at home.

My relationship with the majority my Somali “friends” rapidly deteriorated over one incident with one individual. The person was guilty of a very serious wrong doing and I had to confront him with the truth. Despite an overwhelming amount of evidence of his wrong doing he wanted me to treat him differently and overlook his guilt. I could not. It would have been unfair, unjust, illegal and plain wrong. When I refused to back down, four or five Somali community leaders confronted me to get me to change my mind. I would not. Despite the obvious right vs. wrong, I also discovered, that what was important was for the Somali clan/family to stick together and defend one of their own, no matter how wrong or guilty he appeared to be. Understandable, but still not right under American culture.

Realizing their pressure for me to change would not work, they appealed to the city mayor. That did not work either because the mayor knew me well enough to know that I would not mistreat anyone or treat them unfairly. Then they reported me to local law enforcement. When that failed, members of their community proclaimed me a “racist” and a hater of black people and reported me to the local and regional Human Rights Commission. When a representative of the HRC visited me and heard my side and I produced the evidence to back my story, she closed the case. However, certain Somali were not done with me yet. They sicced a civil rights attorney on me, but that too failed.
To say the least, the wrong doing of one person, who could not admit that wrong doing, destroyed the relationship with the majority. Along the way, I discovered that among this group of Somali “friends” it was more important to lie and save face, then admit wrong and simply resolve the matter.

Years later I discovered the Islamic concept of taqiyya, the Islamic permission to lie and deceive another—especially a non-Muslim—when in a foreign land. Taqiyya can, and often does, affect much of the communication and understanding between Muslims and non-Muslims in the West where Muslims are in the minority. It also makes it very difficult to trust the word or action of some Muslims in their relationships with non-Muslims.

Going forward, what can non-Somali Americans expect from the immigrants from the Horn of Africa? Are they here to assimilate, adapt, embrace the American culture, our laws and experience the relative freedom and safety not available to them in their native land? Undoubtedly, some desire that and may be able to achieve it, and are certainly welcome to do so. However, I do know from personal experience and further study and observation, that the “clan” culture and Islamic teaching is so oppressive and imprisoning, that it takes an exceptional Somali/Muslim to break away from the norm and seek their own reality and truth.

So, where can we look to perhaps get a peek into America’s future with an ever growing Somali population? In addition to a thorough understanding of Islamic thought and law (shari’a), with the Somali, one might look at the Constitution of The Federal Republic of Somalia adopted August 1, 2012. The 56-page document has 143 articles.

One does not have to read very far into the constitution to understand the mindset behind it.

Article 1.
(1) Somalia is a federal, sovereign, and democratic republic founded on inclusive representation of the people, a multiparty system and social justice.
(2) After Allah the Almighty, all power is vested in the people and can only be exercised in accordance with the Constitution and the law . . .
Article 2.
(1) Islam is the religion of the State.
(2) No religion other than Islam can be propagated in the country.
(3) No law can be enacted that is not compliant with the general principles and objectives of Shari’ah.
Article 3.
(1) The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Somalia is based on the foundations of the Holy Quran and the Sunna of our prophet Mohamed (PBUH) and protects the higher objectives of Shari’ah and social justice.
(2) The Federal Republic of Somalia is a Muslim country . . .
(3) The Federal Republic of Somalia is founded upon the fundamental principles of power sharing . . .
(4) The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Somalia promotes human rights . . .
(5) Women must be included . . .
Article 4.
(1) After the Shari’ah, the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Somalia is the supreme law of the country. . . .

The concept of a fair and just law under shari’ah is ludicrous, of course.  Islamic law does not permit freedom of choice, freedom of religion; nor does it promote human rights nor equality for women.

So, how committed are the Somali to a constitutionally free government of a democratic republic? According to Open Doors’ 2019 World Watch List, seven years after the validation of their new constitution, Somalia ranked #3 among the top ten countries where Christians were persecuted the most. Only North Korea and Afghanistan preceded Somalia. For 2018, FreedomHouse.org published their list of Freedom in the World list of countries with the greatest degree of freedom. Of 195 countries, Somalia ranked among the top eight worst countries for personal, religious and other freedoms.

In 2013, another survey organization, Transparency International (www.transparency.org) tallied the data on 177 countries on the level of corporate and political corruption. This time Somalia was ranked #1 ahead of such well known corrupt countries as Afghanistan, North Korea and Venezuela. Five years later, for 2018, Transparency International published another Corruption Perceptions Index. Of 180 countries surveyed, Somalia was still firmly in the number one spot, with Syria, South Sudan, Yemen and North Korea nipping at its heels.

2018_CPI_Globalmap_cover_image_3_1280_635

Darkest red countries are the most corrupt. Credit: https://www.transparency.org/cpi2018.

So, with so little positive going for it, it is no wonder hundreds of thousands of Somali have fled their homeland over the last two-plus decades. The question is: How much of the country’s ills and terroristic baggage that is represented in their life-long indoctrination to Islam and Shari’a (which is the inherent source of their problems) do Somali refugees leave behind?

Referring back to the Somalia constitution, remember, it is Islam that is the state ideology and it is the barbaric law of shari’a that is the primary law of the land.
In Article 8 of the Somalia constitution it states: A person who is a Somali citizen cannot be deprived of Somali citizenship, even if they become a citizen of another country.  How many Somali living outside Somalia have given up their Somalia citizenship in favor of allegiance to their new country of residence? I do not know. Does anyone? Is it a fair question? Maybe, maybe not, but I bet very few if any have renounced their allegiance to their homeland.

In June, 2012, Voice of America (VOA) published a survey of over 3000 Somali living in Somalia, but also those living in Kenyan refugee camps. Perhaps, surprisingly, despite the horrors of life in their homeland, an overwhelming 93 percent (87 strongly agreed; 6 agreed) supported shari’a as being the law of the land. Only 5 percent of Somalis surveyed were against shari’a.

Somali favoring sharia

On June 23, 2015, The Center for Security Policy released the results of a poll of 600 American Muslims taken two weeks prior. A slim majority (51%) believed that, “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.” In a different survey, when American citizens were asked the same question, only 2 percent agreed that shari’a should be an option to the U.S. Constitution.

It, of course, does not help America’s perception of Somali when the first elected person to the U.S. Congress to represent their community/district, Ilhan Omar, has clearly positioned herself as anti-American, anti-Jew and anti-Christian. But that’s a story for another post (maybe).

For more information on Islam, visit: https://understandingislaminthelightofchristianity.com/

 

Is Islam a Complete Fabrication?

December 19, 2019

Is Islam a completely contrived “religion” developed over centuries by Arabic leaders seeking wealth and control over their neighbors?

understandingislamcover

Available at: https://understandingislaminthelightofchristianity.com

Is Muhammad a fictional figurehead/“prophet” conveniently conceived to promote this diabolical ideology?

Is the Qur’an a complete fabrication by many contributors, rather than a “revealed” message to one person?

Numerous academics and researchers who have studied Islam over many decades have found little proof to substantiate the claims of Islamic leaders or the validity of the Qur’an as a revealed script.

Three American author/researchers—Cheri Berens, Dr. Patricia Crone and Robert Spencer—have serious doubts about the validity of the claims of Islam and Muhammad. There are dozens more archeologists, researchers and academics over the decades who could not verify the multitude of claims by Muslims on the history and validity of Islam as a “revealed” religion to a prophet called Muhammad.

Without writing a “book,” what does Islam provide to support the veracity of the many Muslim claims about their religion and prophet?

Here is what we can surmise based on non-Muslim archeological and historical evidence:
• There is no verifiable written history about Muhammad outside of Islamic sources.
• An original Qur’an does not exist. In fact, in the early history of Islam, after Muhammad’s death (according to Islamic leaders), many different versions of the Qur’an existed, each favoring the conquest agenda of one Arabic Muslim tribe/faction or another.
• The Qur’an is a disjointed piece of literature that gives credence to the suspicion that it was created over many centuries by many Muslim contributors.
• The lack of any chronology to the chapters of the Qur’an or consistent thematic elements provide further evidence that the Qur’an is a potpourri of additions over a long period.
• The concept of abrogation, which is unique to Islam, and where Allah reveals a change in mind, offers the convenient opportunity for early followers of Islam to make changes to the developing ideology that suited past Islamic leader objectives.
• The many contrived retelling of biblical stories that contradict the original Bible accounts provide evidence that whoever created the Qur’an did not receive revelation insight, but, instead, pieced together oral fabrications.
• Although Muslims claim that Jerusalem belongs to them, the word “Jerusalem” or any reference to it does not occur in the Qur’an.
• Centuries of archeological evidence from Jerusalem and the Holy Land have produced thousands of artifacts that prove the occupation of the region by Jews for many millennia. By contrast, despite the hundreds of archeological excavations in Jerusalem and throughout the Holy Land region, no Islamic artifacts have been discovered that pre-date the seventh century.
• The Qur’an is largely a distorted collection of Jewish, Christian and pagan practices and beliefs in Arabia and its environs during the seventh and eighth centuries.
• No archeological evidence has been discovered to prove that Mecca or Medina existed during the time Muhammad was supposed to have lived.
• Of the 25 prophets claimed by Islam, 20 are from the Bible, one is Muhammad, one is Jesus, and the other three are claimed to be Arabic prophets who lived 2,000 years before Islam was birthed.
• In the Qur’an, Muhammad is only mentioned four times by name. However, Moses is cited 502 times, Abraham 245 times and Jesus 25 times.
• For a prophet of Muhammad’s supposed notoriety, there was no foretelling of his arrival among the Jews or Christians, or any other belief system before his time.
• None of Muhammad’s supposed associates are mentioned in the Qur’an.
• None of Muhammad’s 13-14 wives are mentioned in the Qur’an.
• The Qur’an is totally credited to Muhammad, even though Muslim sources say he was illiterate and there is no non-Muslim verification that he ever existed.
• Islamic sources admit that the Qur’an was an oral tradition for decades, maybe longer, before attempts were made to write it down.
• Many researchers, including Berens, have verified that the first Qur’ans were written in Aramaic (the language of Christ), not Arabic as Muslims claim.
• According to Berens, the Qur’an of today is written in a form of Arabic that is not a spoken language or in use in everyday conversation by the Arabs of the world.
• The extreme violence and retribution portrayed throughout the Qur’an are more indicative of a military manual of conquest than a spiritual guide for lost souls.
• The strong anti-Semitic and anti-Christian rhetoric in the Qur’an illustrates the main objective of Islamic caliphs after Muhammad’s “death” was the conquest and subjugation of Jewish and Christian populations in the Middle East and Europe in the 7th-12th centuries.

There are many more indicators that Islam is a contrivance of ancient Islamic caliphs to gain control over their non-Muslim neighbors, principally Christians and Jews, but also various pagan populations. The false and barbaric doctrines of Islam continue to lead billions of people astray in order to bring about world domination.

New Website

June 20, 2019

Visit my new website at: https://understandingislaminthelightofchristianity.com/

 

Understanding Islam in the Light of Christianity–the Book

May 8, 2019

Now Available!!

understandingislamcover.png

This is the go-to resource on Islam from a Christian perspective.  It is designed to provide everything one needs to know about Islam, the greatest challenge of the 21st century for the Church and the Christian community.  An invaluable compendium for homeschooling parents and organizations, church pastors and leaders, Christian schools, universities and seminaries.  If you truly want to reach the Muslim community with the truth of the Gospel of Jesus Christ or just want to be more knowledgeable about what is happening in the world, the West and America, this is a must resource book for your library. After nearly 20 years of research, Dr. Gauss has put together a one of a kind resource that is designed to educate Christian leaders/teachers on the unadulterated truth about Islam and the extreme challenge it presents to the Church and the Christian community and how Muslims can be presented with the truth of the Gospel without the Church lowering itself to “Common Ground” or “Interfaith Dialogue.” Understanding Islam in the  Light of Christianity A comparison of the Messenger, Message and Mission of the Qur’an and the Bible  An Invaluable Compendium By James F. Gauss, Ph.D. Author of Islam & Christianity, A Revealing Contrast.

Dr. Gauss, in this profound study, is upholding the truth of the Gospel, revealing the fallacies of a false religion. His pen is sharp but the imprint of his spirit is marked with compassion and love for a lost people who believe they are worshipping the one true God.

I commend Dr. Gauss on writing such an informative book bringing out the darkness that covers every page of the Quran and delusions of the Islamic faith.

May there be more voices such as Dr. Gauss proclaiming the truth of God with boldness and in the spirit of Christ. And may we witness freedom for millions of Muslims who are bound by a dark and evil force!

Blow the trumpet in Zion; sound the alarm on my holy hill. Let all who live in the land tremble….

Pastor Reza Safa (Former Iranian Shi’a Muslim); President, TBN Nejat TV; Director, TBN Middle East; Author of Inside Islam: Exposing and reaching the world of Islam

Understanding Islam in the Light of Christianity

8.5 x 11 – Over 480 pages $49.95 Hardcover (plus tax) • $34.95 Soft cover (plus tax)

Order from https://understandingislaminthelightofchristianity.com

What if . . .?

January 11, 2018

The main argument for unfettered immigration in the United States is that America has an ever shrinking workforce due to a non-replacement birth rate of 2.1 births per child bearing age women in the U.S.  There is no question that America’s birth rate is currently below replacement rate.  With more and more Americans opting to forego marriage and family or women choosing to have fewer children later in life, America’s fertility rate has been more or less on a steady decline.  So, the obvious solution is to bring in more and more immigrants, no matter where they are from or what their skill level or potential contribution to society and America’s well established culture and values.

There is, however, a simple (albeit, hind sighted) solution without having to unnecessarily import hundreds of thousands of immigrants who have no allegiance to America, its future and values.

Since the passage of Roe vs. Wade in January, 1973 (now, stay with me), there have been somewhere between 58 million and 60 million young American lives snuffed out in the womb or right after birth . . . deliberately.

What if these human beings were allowed to live, grow, eat, have health care, become educated, get jobs, raise families, etc.?  What might have been their financial contribution to America’s economy, much less to its inventions, education, scientific and cultural advancements and much more?

As a case in point, it has been estimated by various sources that it takes $250,000 to $300,000 to raise one child from birth through age 18.  (What follows is simple math, not intended to be 100% correct, but rather to make a thought-provoking point.)  In the past 45 years of U.S. abortions, the nation’s butchers have averaged 1.333 million inhuman endings to innocent life per year.  If those children had been allowed to exist, those raising them through age 18 purportedly would have added nearly $400 billion to the U.S. economy each year.

But wait!  What might these abortion survivors be contributing to the U.S. workforce and economy after reaching age 18?  The first year of Roe vs. Wade survivors reaching age 18 would have been 1991.  Inflation calculations and other variables aside, let’s say each survivor, on average, once reaching age 18 and beyond (to age 45 in 2017) contributed $30,000/year to the U.S. economy through work, education, purchases, investments, societal contributions, etc.  That total would come to about $40 billion PER YEAR (less in younger years, more in older years).  Each year post 1991 there would have been a “new crop” of 1.333 million 18 year olds hitting the U.S. economy, so that by the beginning of 2018, the combined impact of these 18+ year old survivors might have been $1.8 trillion toward America’s 2018 GDP.

I know this is gross over simplification, but you get the point: each person taken out from full participation in society, whether through abortion or some other premature death, not only has an emotional (and in the case of abortion, a moral) impact on family and society, but on the financial impact as well.

But what about the economic contributions of new immigrants?  Figures are equally hard to secure, but the latest figures I could find were that a 2011 federal report claimed that immigrants contributed an estimated $743 billion to the U.S. economy.  However, a 2012 report cited in the National Review and elsewhere, stated that “illegal” immigrants were costing U.S. taxpayers $113 billion a year in taxpayer funded benefits while at the same time paying little or no income taxes.  So, the net contribution of immigrants to the U.S. economy might be estimated at $630 billion, or one-third that of the accumulated contribution of non-aborted children.

Despite the fact that the foregoing statistics could be endlessly picked apart, I find the thought intriguing, if not morally astute, don’t you?  Let me know your thoughts.

Oh, and where would America and the Christian church be today as world leaders had they not submitted to a culture of murdering of the innocents?  Just saying.

 

Books by Gauss:  https://ampatriot.wordpress.com/books-by-dr-gauss/

 

Early Headline: “Trump/Pence Win!”

November 6, 2016

As some of my early blogs on this election would testify, I was not enthusiastic about Donald Trump as the GOP presidential nominee. However, about two months ago I realized that this election is far more about the future of the nation; the administrative cabinets, department and agency heads, the Departments of Justice, Defense and Homeland Security in particular, that matter more than the presidential candidate.

That being said, while Trump has his baggage (as virtually all candidates do), one thing he has demonstrated far more than Clinton and that is his extreme patriotism and desire to right the wrongs in America.

So, here’s my prediction, and I will go way out on a limb. Trump will win.  Not only win, but win by a wide margin, perhaps 10 percent or more.  Here’s why:

  • A large number of moderate democrats who are sick of the Hillary (and Bill) scandals, habitual lying and self-enrichment, will either stay home or vote for Trump/Pence.
  • A growing number of Black and Hispanic voters are finally seeing the light and realizing that Hillary represents more of the same lies and disaster for minority populations.
  • Trump support is on a strong upswing right before the election, while Clinton’s is on the downswing.
  • While Trump has been focusing mostly on policy of late, the best Clinton can do is keep bringing up the old dead issue of Trump’s immoral pronouncements about women twenty years ago.
  • The FBI announcement about re-opening their Clinton investigation has shattered any support Clinton might have garnered from the undecideds. The majority will vote for Trump.
  • Trump supporters are not fair-weather supporters. They will vote no matter what the weather or obstacles.
  • More and more Americans are waking up to the depth of Clinton’s corruption.
  • The majority of Americans are sick of all the ineffectiveness and corruption in Washington.
  • Hillary Clinton represents more of the same Washington corruption; Trump represents a fresh face with new hope.
  • Patriotic Americans will vote against anyone who does not uphold the Second Amendment and the right to bear arms.  Clinton is clearly against that provision of the Constitution.
  • The majority of Christian voters understand that Clinton is anti-Christian and anti-Israel.
  • People are realizing the real danger of the Clinton immigration and open borders policy.
  • American patriots have not forgotten about Benghazi and Clinton’s “what difference does it make” statement.
  • More Americans understand the disastrous foreign policies of Obama/Clinton that has resulted in the explosion of Islamic terrorism in the Middle East, Europe and the U.S.
  • The Obamacare debacle will hurt Clinton who is in favor of socialized medical care.
  • Traditionally democratic states are trending in favor of Trump or are “toss-ups” right before the election.
  • For the past few weeks Trump has been acting more presidential, while Clinton has been acting more unhinged.

So, here’s my bold prediction (not seen anywhere else): Trump/Pence will command 55% or more of the popular vote and at least 300 electoral votes (270 needed to win).

Now, that will prevent Hillary from pardoning herself. If we can be patient and wait until Trump takes office and select a new attorney general, then Obama will not be able to pardon her either should she be indicted.  That would be ideal.

 

The 2016 Presidential Election (Kathleen’s Insight)

October 16, 2016

There is one candidate who is for the things below and one who is opposed.

  • One is pro-Israel, the other is not.
  • One is for freedom of speech, the other wants to control speech.
  • One wants lawful immigration, the other wants open borders.
  • One wants justice in our court system, the other wants activist judges that create law, rather than interpret the law.
  • One wants free enterprise, the other wants increased government regulation.
  • One wants the U.S. Constitution to be the law of the land, the other favors the U.N. Constitution.
  • The one is pro-life, the other wants to support increased abortion, including partial-birth abortion.
  • The one supports freedom of religion, the other seeks to suppress Christianity in America.
  • One has never been investigated for criminal activity, while the other is under constant investigation for such activity at the highest levels.
  • One understands economics and the advantages of capitalism and job creation, the other favors socialism, government control and has never created a job in the free market.
  • The one profits from Wall Street through wise investment, the other profits from Wall Street by giving worthless speeches.
  • One stands firm against corruption in government, the other has been a part of that corruption for decades.
  • One seeks advice from Christian leaders, the other relies on radical socialists.
  • The one wants to rebuild our decimated military, the other wants to continue its demise.
  • The one wants parental control of education, the other wants government control.
  • The one wants to protect America’s sovereignty, the other wants a One World globalist America.
  • One supports racial equality, the other foments racial divisiveness.
  • One respects and supports the sacrifice of America’s veterans, the other despises America’s military personnel.
  • One has demonstrated financial responsibility in matters of finance, the other had $6 billion of taxpayer monies disappear and unaccounted for during time in government office.
  • One believes in parents and families raising children, the other believes government should.
  • One is surrounding himself with patriotic leaders, the other with far left socialists.
  • One expresses the love of country and countrymen, the other speaks of despising fellow Americans.
  • One is for equal opportunity and the “American Dream”, the other for the re-distribution of wealth.
  • One opposes gay rights and gay marriage, the other believes they are constitutional guarantees like freedom of speech and freedom of religion.
  • One stands for law and order, the other for selective justice.

God did not choose to give us a Christian candidate. Perhaps that was the fault of the divided Christian community.  Instead, He gave us a person who is a “work in progress” like all of us.  One who believes in justice and who has strong convictions not unlike most Christians but expresses those convictions in ways that are often unacceptable to most of us.  However, they are sincerely held beliefs.  The other candidate provides evidence every day of being a pathological liar who has repeatedly deceived the American people.

A City on a Hill. If the Church and we as Christians are called to be “the salt of the earth” . . . “the light of the world” . . . and to be “A city set on a hill” that should not be hidden (Jesus in Matthew 5:13-14), why is it so hard for many Christians to believe that God planted His church and His people in America for the sake of the nation?

From the very founding of our country God has given His church (and His people) the responsibility for the spiritual well being of the nation. He gave America a constitution based on Judeo-Christian values—not Islamic, not Hindu, not atheistic or any other).  It has proved to be the best form of self-government the world has ever known.  Ironically, but by political design, our educational system now teaches the value of the U.N. constitution and globalism and Islamic thought.  These are two very different anti-freedom, anti-Christian and oppressive systems.  Partly as a result of these re-education systems (and to a lesser degree, biblical interpretations), many Christians believe that they should not be involved in politics or hold political office.  God foresaw this outcome of anti-God globalism with His revelation to the Apostle John on the Isle of Patmos nearly 2000 years ago.

As Christians living in America we are part of the most unique “experiment” in the history of the world—a self-governing people whose laws and way of life were founded on biblical principles. The Church was planted here in America for the sake of the country and the mandate of Christians to spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ worldwide.

As citizens of God’s Kingdom on earth we have a responsibility to demonstrate God’s love and righteousness in our midst; to be accountable for our actions or lack thereof in standing up for righteousness and mercy. I believe this is America’s last call for redemption.  The advantage that Satan has is that the Church has always been divided by pettiness, pride, rivalry and biblical incidentals.  We have untold denominations and sects, each believing they have the “truth”.  Here is the “truth”—“a kingdom” (country) or “house divided cannot stand” (Matthew 12:25).  America is divided mainly because the Church is divided.

For it is time for judgment to begin with the household of God; and if it begins  with us first, what will be the outcome for those who do not obey the gospel of God?  (1 Peter 4:17).

Founding Father, John Adams, in his Thoughts on Government (1776), wrote: Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, the people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it. It is the responsibility of the populace, the American people, including Christians, to hold their elected officials accountable for their actions and decisions and to make sure they are upholding the law of the land and not implementing their own for their own benefit or agenda. An election is the one best opportunity, bar a revolution, to bring about a change of government when one is needed.

John Adams, in a speech before the Militia of Massachusetts declared, Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other (October 11, 1798). Perhaps that is America’s biggest problem, we have fallen away from God and as a whole are no longer a people of faith.  We have allowed our Constitution to be trashed by globalists and irreligious elitists with self-serving interests and not that of the people.  God will hold Christians accountable for the outcome of America’s unique world contribution to self-government.

 

The 2016 Presidential Election

October 16, 2016

A Christian’s Perspective

As Christians and Americans we have a challenging decision to make this election. Never in the history of our country have we had two least desirable candidates for the highest office in the land and perhaps the most powerful leadership position in the world.  For most, the decision boils down to Clinton or Trump, or “none of the above.”  It has been a presidential campaign marked by continuous accusations, threats, intimidations and lapses in moral character—all of which should be reprehensible for the Christian believer.

The truth is, America has never had a righteous, sinless person run or get elected to public office.  Not even George Washington, who was unquestionably the best and most humble person to hold the office of president of the United States.

However, I have come to realize, that despite the undesirable nature of each major candidate, for the Christian or patriotic American, this election is not about, “do I vote for Clinton or Trump?”, but what kind of presidential administration, judicial system, military, law, immigration policy, respect of life, civil rights, respect of the Bill of Rights and U.S. Constitution, etc. do I want and expect from the nation’s leadership?  Which candidate is most likely to surround himself or herself with law abiding cabinet members that will implement the will of the people?  Which one will seek to establish a judicial system that not only follows the Constitution, but interprets the law and does not make new law without the consent of the people or Congress?  Which one will rebuild the U.S. military that has been decimated over the last 8 years to levels not seen since WWII?  Which one will seek to re-establish racial harmony and oneness instead fomenting divisiveness?  Which one has pledged to respect the lives of the unborn?  Which one will uphold justice for all?  Which one has pledged to follow the Bill of Rights which guarantees the freedom of speech, religion, the press, right to peacefully assemble and bear arms?  Which one has agreed to protect our country’s borders and implement a sane immigration policy? Which one is likely to follow the law when signing into law congressional laws or mandates?

The presidency is much more than just the presidential candidate, it is the course of America and what we desire our country to look like.  Now, let me make myself clear: As a Christian, I am a Christ follower first, then an American in terms of birth and placement.  I have said for years that America has slid past the point where human intervention will save her.  Only God can and will redeem her, but only if the Church and its people repent for allowing things to get this bad through ignoring sin and refusing to stand up for righteousness.

Also read: https://ampatriot.wordpress.com/2016/10/16/the-2016-presidential-election-kathleens-insight/